542
21809/01
relate to river steamers must be read in conjunction with the provisions in Section 38.
4. (3).
If the words in this clause "when leaving
the waters of the Colony" are to stand should not a penalty be imposed in 4 (4) on a Colonial ship not exceed- ing 60 tons trading or plying for hire which leaves or attempts to leave the waters of the Colony without Officers having the requisite certificate
The penalty in sub-sec.4 of this section is limited to the case of vessels leaving or attempting to leave any port.
4. (8). See letter of Board of Trade to Colonial Office of 21st June, 1901, disposing of this.
4. (12).)
6. (1)
on these.
: I have no further observations to make
5. (10). There is a note (not quite accurate)
on this section which has not been noticed but an arend - ment similar to that suggested has been made in 37 (12).
9. (2). The suggested amendment does not appear to bring the section of the Ordinance into line with the Merchant Shipping Act, but there seem to be local con- siderations why the difference should be permitted.
9. (6). My remarks on this sub-section in my memo. of 25th August 1900 do not appear to be dealt with. 25774/00
10.(1b). There would seem to be some past usage to found a claim upon.
10. (24). I have no further comments to make on this
sub-clause.
13. I still think that the exemption of ships which comply with the provisions of the Herchant Shin ing Act should be specifically made in the Ordinance.
14.7
3
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.